Log in
Latest topics
» Two Points For Honestyby Niemand 9th August 2022, 12:12 am
» This Dark and Twisty Road
by Niemand 10th June 2020, 10:38 pm
» Pet Peeves
by Niemand 19th February 2019, 9:35 pm
» RPG Pet Peeves
by Niemand 19th February 2019, 9:33 pm
» Picking Up the Pieces
by Niemand 23rd November 2018, 12:09 am
» Eye of the Storm
by Niemand 6th October 2018, 8:15 pm
» Calm Before the Storm
by Holly 4th October 2018, 9:37 pm
» Corrupt a Wish
by Niemand 1st October 2018, 3:47 am
» Dog Days of Winter
by Holly 25th September 2018, 5:17 pm
Top posting users this month
No user |
The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
3 posters
Page 1 of 1
The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
I'm going to say it straight up. I've only read the first two books of this series. Heck, I didn't even know what the Hunger Games was until only a few months ago. That being said this movie wasn't as cracked up as I thought.
Did anyone else get the feeling it was revolving around emotional character development more than anything? I wanted to see a little more about the revolution and a little less about Katniss sobbing and Peeta being tortured.
The best part of the movie for me was the creepy song The Hanging Tree. It flowed and showed a plot change in a way. What did you think?
Did anyone else get the feeling it was revolving around emotional character development more than anything? I wanted to see a little more about the revolution and a little less about Katniss sobbing and Peeta being tortured.
The best part of the movie for me was the creepy song The Hanging Tree. It flowed and showed a plot change in a way. What did you think?
Tyler- Partner
- Posts : 728
Re: The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
I have to say that I wasn't really into Hunger Games and still not. But I read them due to constant nagging by some friends. I have to say that they were okay. And I have seen the first two movies. Haven't seen Mockingjay part 1 but I can say the reason for what you said was because all the actual action stuff happens at the end of the book. And yeah. Best part of the book was the hanging tree song.
Niemand- Supervisor
- Posts : 480
Re: The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
I think it's the irony of the whole plot that gives the movie some interest. The heroine is practically useless; except maybe as a pseudo-figurehead that does short films to inspire the rest of Panem. Anyone notice how the revolution centers more on media manipulation than it does with actual fighting? It's almost always a publicity stunt in the books, nothing more than a facade. To quote a review that I agree with, "Subverting pop culture is a tool of the powerless". And to be honest, I wasn't even interested in the main protagonist's life as I was with the revolution itself.
Here's another quote from the review that I agree with:
"The most positive interpretation of Mockingjay is that it’s a daring postmodern step past simple satire of the reality TV-loving masses. Katniss was a hero of action in The Hunger Games, taking her sister’s place in the Games and manipulating the Capitol into changing the rules to save her. She was a hero of reaction in Catching Fire, unwittingly playing out her part in a larger scheme. Now, Mockingjay is creating its own version of David Foster Wallace’s hero of non-action in Infinite Jest : not a character "beyond calm, divorced from all stimulus" but one that genuinely has no existence or effect beyond her appearance on a screen within a screen. A character who, after years of manipulating her appearance, has actually started to become television."
Here's another quote from the review that I agree with:
"The most positive interpretation of Mockingjay is that it’s a daring postmodern step past simple satire of the reality TV-loving masses. Katniss was a hero of action in The Hunger Games, taking her sister’s place in the Games and manipulating the Capitol into changing the rules to save her. She was a hero of reaction in Catching Fire, unwittingly playing out her part in a larger scheme. Now, Mockingjay is creating its own version of David Foster Wallace’s hero of non-action in Infinite Jest : not a character "beyond calm, divorced from all stimulus" but one that genuinely has no existence or effect beyond her appearance on a screen within a screen. A character who, after years of manipulating her appearance, has actually started to become television."
Ian- Admin
- Posts : 21
Re: The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
That's actually an interesting way to put Katniss, Ian. And you're serious Rae? Her constant sobbing is in the last book? Not sure I entirely want to read the last book now. I'm going to wait for Mockingjay Part two to play out before I read it, so I don't read the book and then think the movie is completely terrible.
Tyler- Partner
- Posts : 728
Re: The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
Yeah, Katniss is at her most emotional and useless state in the last book. She's practically hormonal.
Ian- Admin
- Posts : 21
Re: The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
Dude, only reason I read the trilogy was because I was threatened. Basically, I really dislike it and want to scrub the whole experience from my brain. I was rooting for Peeta in the last book -.- And bwhahahahahaha Ian! It's totally like that! Sorry, but she doesn't really have any character development until like the very end.
Niemand- Supervisor
- Posts : 480
Re: The Hunger Games (Mockingjay Part 1)
I amend my statements. I still don't like the series and really you actually need to read the books to get what they were doing. But, she did well with the whole media thing. About how the government is the one that sensors the media. That is what is happening now. We don't see ALL the real news, but only what our government has deemed as news and wants us to see. Everything it doesn't, it sensors, or whatever.
Niemand- Supervisor
- Posts : 480
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|